Proposal Development Tools
This is a public-access website in which faculty share copies of proposals submitted to various international sponsors (including U.S. Federal Agencies) that principal investigators can view to review the structure/format of sponsor-specific proposals. The list includes both funded and unfunded proposals (as reflected in the table).
NSF-Specific Data Management Plan
Managing your research data is an effective strategy for ensuring that it will be usable, preserved, maintained, and accessible throughout the life cycle of a research project and for future generations of scientific research.
Moreover, federal funding agencies are now requiring data management plans as part of grant proposal packages. The Auburn University Libraries, in conjunction with the Offices of Sponsored Programs and Proposal Services and Faculty Support have developed an NSF-specific Data Management Plan (DMP). This template is intended to help AU researchers draft effective data management plans for the NSF and other funding agencies with similar requirements. The template addresses the six points mentioned in the original NSF guidelines: role and responsibilities, types of data, data formats and metadata, policies for public access, policies and provisions for re-use and re-distribution, and plans for archiving and preservation.
The Auburn Center for Evaluation was established in 2014 as a state of the art resource for those who want to understand the impact of their programs and who want to use their resources in the most effective way. Services include:
- Large and small scale evaluation
- Evaluation planning
- Qualitative and quantitative data analysis
- Logic models
Statistical Consulting Center
The Statistical Consulting Center was established in 2014 with a mission to assist researchers at Auburn University with the statistical aspects of their research projects. This includes:
- Study design
- Power analysis
- Data collection
- Data analysis
- Interpretation of results
- Response to reviewers
Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS)
The Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) based at UAB is a large center funded by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program -- one of 62 nationwide and the only CTSA in Alabama. Auburn University is a partner within the CCTS Partner Network which crosses institutional boundaries to improve human health and health care delivery. CCTS is available to assist AU biomedical scientists with project and proposal development at both early and late stages. The Research Commons page of the CCTS website provides a number of resources (and contact information). General information regarding the partnership can be found below.
In order to provide resources for faculty and staff, Auburn University has partnered with Hanover Research for a number of grant development solutions including: Pre-proposal Support; Proposal Development; and Capacity Building. Their full-service grant development solutions are available to set goals, build strategies to achieve key grantseeking objectives, and develop grant proposals that are well-planned, researched, and written. For information regarding Hanover’s core capabilities and project time lines, click here.
Does Hanover have experience with a wide range of funders?
Yes. Hanover has experience with a wide range of funders - private, nonprofit, and federal - including but not limited to NSF, NIH, AHRQ, DOD, and PCORI.
How does a PI request this service?
If you are interested in seeking Hanover’s assistance, please contact Tony Ventimiglia (334-844-5954 or firstname.lastname@example.org).
How does Hanover approach proposal reviews?
A Hanover grants consultant may address general scientific elements of a proposal, such as:
Construct or structure of the hypothesis and methodology. While Hanover does not purport to provide “scientific reviews” that evaluate the specific science underpinning proposals, its grants consultants will flag where they think research questions, aims, and hypotheses could be strengthened and better aligned.
Literature review. Hanover grants consultants will note places where a citation is needed and has not been included.
Clarity and focus. When they suspect that narrative content lacks sufficient clarity, consistency, or rigor, Hanover grants consultants will pose questions to encourage the PI to verify the science, and/or suggest a review by a senior colleague or program officer.
Is there a cost to the individual PI for the service?
No. The cost of this service is provided through the Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development
What is the turnaround time for Hanover's services?
The turnaround time for Hanover’s services varies by service type. A REVIEW is generally turned around 10 business days from the date Hanover receives all requested grant documents. A REVISION provides an added level of support and as such, is generally turned around 15 business days from the date Hanover receives all requested grant documents.
Hanover Program Specific Webinars